Multiwfn forum

Multiwfn official website: //www.umsyar.com/multiwfn. Multiwfn forum in Chinese: http://bbs.keinsci.com/wfn

You are not logged in.

#12024-08-01 23:00:04

saeed_E
Member
Registered: 2019-12-21
Posts: 237

Are fragments need to be explicitly defined for DFT-SAPT?

Dear Tian,

As you know much better than me, a DFT-SAPT needs "grac_shift" values for monomers. Please consider the below template employed for a given DFT-SAPT calculation:

memory 55 gb

molecule {
0 1
F 0.00000000 0.00000000 -1.85087700
H 0.00000000 0.00000000 -0.86870700
--
-1 1
Cl 0.00000000 0.00000000 1.03097600

units angstrom
no_reorient
symmetry c1
}

set {
basis aug-cc-pVTZ
df_basis_scf aug-cc-pvtz-jkfit
df_basis_sapt aug-cc-pvtz-ri
scf_type DF
guess sad
freeze_core True
sapt_dft_functional pbe0
sapt_dft_grac_shift_a 0.157
sapt_dft_grac_shift_b 0.215
}

energy('sapt(dft)')

The question is as follows:

the "sapt_dft_grac_shift_a" is always regarded to the monomer whose structure is given first (HF in the present case) and "sapt_dft_grac_shift_b" is always regarded to the monomer whose structure is given second (Cl anion in the present case). Is my statement quite correct?

If no, we should properly define monomer a (for which grac_shift_a is considered) and monomer b (for which grac_shift_b is considered). If possible, considering the given template, please let me know how these two monomers should explicitly and appropriately be defined in two blocks.

Sincerely,
Saeed

Offline

#22024-08-02 14:24:01

sobereva
Tian Lu (Multiwfn developer)
From: Beijing
Registered: 2017-09-11
Posts: 1,765
Website

Re: Are fragments need to be explicitly defined for DFT-SAPT?

Correct.

Offline

#32024-08-02 14:37:58

saeed_E
Member
Registered: 2019-12-21
Posts: 237

Re: Are fragments need to be explicitly defined for DFT-SAPT?

Dear Tian,
Thank you very very much, my nice friend.

Sincerely,
Saeed

Offline

Board footer

Baidu
map