Multiwfn official website: //www.umsyar.com/multiwfn. Multiwfn forum in Chinese: http://bbs.keinsci.com/wfn
You are not logged in.
I am doing a PDOS graph for a graphene quantum dot (GQDs) molecule. This GQDs has hydroxyl, epoxy and carboxyl groups.
I don't understand how to define the fragments in my case:
1) For epoxy groups, should i include the carbons attached to the oxygens (C-O-C) or only the oxygens?
2) For the hydroxyl group, should i include the hydrogen of the O-H, and the carbon attached to this group, or only the oxygen?
3) For the carboxyl, should i include the whole COOH group, or only the oxygens?
This is important because it affects the PDOS graph a lot.
Thank you in advance.
Offline
The choice of the fragments has somewhat arbitrariness, I suggest:
1 COC
2 Only OH
3 COOH
Namely defining the whole functional group in common sense as fragment. In the paper, this definition should be clearly mentioned.
Offline
Sir, you answer helped me greatly. Thank you very much!
Just one more question, if you could answer me. When i make a DOS/PDOS graph to three similar systems, i get graphs with the fermi energy in different ranges of temperature. I see many articles that present this fermi energy in zero.
The correct procedure is to normalize all my graphs to present a fermi energy=0?
Last edited by brunosamp (2023-04-21 22:24:47)
Offline
Fermi level is not well-defined for molecule systems, since their HOMO-LUMO gap is generally not small, making the position of Fermi-level has a strong arbitrariness.
For ease of comparison of DOS/PDOS maps of molecular systems, you can simply shift energy levels so that HOMO occurs at E=0 position. In the DOS module of Multiwfn (latest version), you can find an option "-6 Set shift of energy levels", after choosing it and inputtingH, all MO levels will be shifted by -E(HOMO), and thus HOMO will exactly appear at E=0 in the DOS map.
Offline
Now it is very clear to me.
Thank you very much, sir!
Offline