Multiwfn official website: //www.umsyar.com/multiwfn. Multiwfn forum in Chinese: http://bbs.keinsci.com/wfn
You are not logged in.
Sorry for the late reply, I am incredibly sorry.
I have asked the PSI4 community to extract 2PDM at CCSD(T) level. However, I got nothing yet. Could you tell me how to obtain the 2PDM from the CCSD(T) calculation from PSI4 (preferred since I can access it) or Molpro.
Thanking You
Prasanta
Many many thanks Prof Tian. I am working with PSI4, Lets see if I can find something.
Hi Prof Tian,
I am trying to obtain the HF and CCSD(T) one and two-particle density matrix from the respective wavefunction (like HF or Correlated). I can do this using PySCF, but it takes a lot of memory (1TB for ~200 basis functions for CCSD(T)). This is why I tried to do it with other programs like Psi4 or ORCA which are less memory hungry. However, I do not know how to obtain the DM from wfn file. Note: I am using a custom basis functions.
Thanks
Prasanta
Thank you, Prof. TIan. It works.....
Prof. Tian, In case someone wants to do the same thing you mentioned in the 2nd point of your answer, the manual is not clear (v3.8). I want a set of orbitals suppose homo, lumo, homo+-2 and lumo+-2 into different cube files. how can one proceed?
Thank You Prof. Tian...
Thank you, Professor Tian. I get that part. Can you please tell me what the following means?
139a -> 141a : 0.380347 (c= -0.61672301)
orb pairs config coeff ??
I get orbital pairs, but the next two numbers bothers me. What are these?
Dear Prof Tian,
I have performed vertical excitation using ORCA (default setting) with RSH/def2-TZVP.
The output is this, (only printing interesting texts)
STATE 1: E= 0.085477 au 2.326 eV 18760.0 cm**-1 = 0.000000
139a -> 141a : 0.380347 (c= -0.61672301)
139a -> 142a : 0.021636 (c= -0.14709245)
139a -> 144a : 0.029537 (c= 0.17186373)
140a -> 141a : 0.493712 (c= -0.70264618)
140a -> 142a : 0.021983 (c= -0.14826775)
140a -> 144a : 0.030323 (c= 0.17413609)
STATE 2: E= 0.085954 au 2.339 eV 18864.8 cm**-1 = 0.000000
139a -> 141a : 0.493490 (c= 0.70248856)
139a -> 142a : 0.022278 (c= -0.14925782)
139a -> 144a : 0.027986 (c= 0.16728926)
140a -> 141a : 0.380403 (c= -0.61676836)
140a -> 142a : 0.021947 (c= 0.14814422)
140a -> 144a : 0.027699 (c= -0.16642982)
STATE 3: E= 0.132745 au 3.612 eV 29134.1 cm**-1 = 0.000000
139a -> 142a : 0.123433 (c= 0.35133024)
139a -> 143a : 0.221706 (c= -0.47085677)
139a -> 144a : 0.117215 (c= 0.34236621)
139a -> 146a : 0.039887 (c= -0.19971670)
140a -> 142a : 0.072587 (c= -0.26941893)
140a -> 143a : 0.269701 (c= 0.51932752)
140a -> 144a : 0.061824 (c= -0.24864433)
140a -> 146a : 0.039400 (c= 0.19849355)
STATE 4: E= 0.133335 au 3.628 eV 29263.6 cm**-1 = 0.000000
137a -> 145a : 0.011128 (c= 0.10548751)
139a -> 142a : 0.086160 (c= 0.29353050)
139a -> 143a : 0.212033 (c= 0.46047060)
139a -> 144a : 0.140644 (c= 0.37502547)
140a -> 142a : 0.142376 (c= 0.37732800)
140a -> 143a : 0.156057 (c= 0.39504032)
140a -> 144a : 0.211858 (c= 0.46028051)
When I try to calculate the transition probabilities, it doesn't give back 100%. The system is a closed shell. Any suggestion? or can it be done in Multiwfn? I tried to plot the Uv-vis spectra and see the transitions by this.
Multiwfn sp.out > 11 > 3 > 15 > 0 > 533.04910
What I get,
Sum of absolute values of all transitions: 41.19493
The individual terms are ranked by magnitude of contribution:
#Transition Contribution %
2 36.69845 89.085
1 4.34905 10.557
3 0.12731 0.309
7 0.01532 0.037
4 0.00242 0.006
8 0.00215 0.005
6 0.00015 0.000
5 0.00007 0.000
9 0.00000 0.000
10 0.00000 0.000
How does it calculate the transition percentage?
Thank you Prof. Tian.
Hi there,
I was wondering if there is a way to export MO cube files using Multiwfn.
We can visualize the HOMO, LUMO etc, but can we export the cube files?
Okay, got it.
Thank You, Prof Tian.
Hi Prof Tian,
For testing purposes, I have calculated a single-point (Hartree Fock) calculation on H2 molecule with ORCA and PSI4, followed by reading the .gbw and .fchk file by Multiwfn and exporting electron density to a .txt file with the high grid.
The steps I have taken are as follows.
Multwfn H2.gbw(or H2.fchk) > 5 > 1 > 3 >3
To integrate the electron density, I wrote a small python code which shows the total value of density as 0.28, which should be 2 (for H2). There can be some problems with my program, but when I cross-checked the data, I observed that the 4th column (density value) has only one maxima. Maxima value I obtained is 0.429159635 (from my program) and by using grep "4.291596" output.txt I got only one value "4.29159635E-001".
For H2 molecule, there should be two equal maximum values of density, right?
What could get wrong, any idea?
Thank You Prof. Tian. It works, I am now analyzing the output.
Yes
Main Menu > 5 > 1 > 3 > 3
I am sorry for this misunderstanding Prof. Tian.
What I want to do, for example,
1. Take a molecule, suppose CH2Cl2 , calculate total density > export as 4 column txt file (done via multiwfn)
2. Now I want the density of CH2 and Cl2 separately and export density of CH2 and Cl2 as 4 column txt file.
Since Hirshfeld (or iterative) partitions works well for obtaining atomic densities from a molecule, in a similar fashion, can I get fragment densities as well?
Thank you Prof. Tian for your kind help.
Hi Prof Tian,
I want to partition the total molecular density into small fragment densities based on Hirshfeld method. After that, I need those densities to be outputted as four column .txt file.
Can it be done in Multiwfn?
Thanks and Regards,
Prasanta
Dear Developers,
1. In many of the analysis, such as ESP, NCI etc etc, we go deeper into the Multiwfn submenu and can't view the molecule. Some time it becomes necessary to view the molecule the in the same way as Main Menu > 0. Can this be allowed?
2. If by any means, the x, y, z- axis can be shown with the e Density or ESP contour or in a similar types of plots.
Many many thanks.
Prof Tian, I have used three points to define the plane. I took the liberty to select three points to define such a plane that gives me the maximum atoms to be shown.
By the way, Can this plot be extracted to a script like matplotlib or gnuplot such that one can tweek through the setting?
Dear Users and Prof Tian,
For non-covalent interactions (especially the halogen bonding), the sigma-hole is the LEwis acid region, which can also be observed from the Fukui function for nucleophilic attack (f+). Its condensed to atom variant (fk+) can also be calculated from Multiwfn. However, is it possible to calculated the fk+ for the pi-holes or delta-holes?
Dear Tian, I am also facing same problem. I was using the 3.7 dev version and changed to stable one but the problem persists when using the .gbw file (since the wfn file do not contain the basis information, as stated by Multiwfn).
The error is as followed, when utilizing "4.2.4 Decompose properties at a critical point as orbital contributions" on the manual.
Calculating atomic contributions to orbitals by Hirshfeld method...
forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
I am using Ubuntu 18.04
The bash section is as followed
#Multiwfn
export KMP_STACKSIZE=20000000000
export Multiwfnpath=/home/prasanta/Multiwfn/Multiwfn_3.7_bin_Linux/
export PATH=$PATH:/home/prasanta/Multiwfn/Multiwfn_3.7_bin_Linux/
ulimit -s unlimited
It also sourced properly.
What could be the problem?
Thanks in advance...
Thank you Tian, I will try and get back to you.
Dear Prof Tian,
I have encountered a problem in EDD. I have optimized a NCI complex using m062x/def2tzvpp in ORCA. The .wfn files are formed.
1. In the 4.5.5 section, you have mentioned to use NOSYMM keyword for gaussian, does the similar happens with ORCA?
2. One of my monomer is open-shell, so I used UM062X, other one is closed-shell and the complex is thus treated in UKS. The EDD using UKS shows abrupt results, should I treat the system as ROKS or UKS?
Thank you
Dear Prof Tian Lu and/or other members
I am trying to investigate the Non-Covalent interaction between radical (CH3) and halogen bond donors. I find three very close/dense NCI isosurfaces which are red/blue (weak v d w interaction), so i started to use AIM to search for 3,-1 bcps. The BCPs do not reflect the proper interaction sites as observed from the NCI analysis.
Out of the three NCI surfaces, I find two 3,-1 bcp and one 3,+1 rcp. I do not know if the RCP is attractive or repulsive contribution. The bond path is also wrong. The poincare-hopf relationship also do not hold.
what to do?
Hello Dr Tian Lu
I am posting few issues relating to the generation of Vsmax.
I have optimized few molecules with RI-MP2/aug-cc-pvtz in ORCA 4.2.1 and generated .wfn and .wfx files. I loaded those files with Multiwfn and went to option 12 to 12 (Quantitative analysis of Molecular surface) and start analysis. I have Gaussian configured with Multiwfn but the Multiwfn generates the surface in its own engine. The results obtained are ridiculous. The reported Vs,max of the same region of the same molecule (F2) is 14, whereas Multiwfn shows it 53 kcal/mol.
So, where the problem is?
a. The ORCA wfn files can not be used?
b. Only the gaussian fchk files to be used?
c. The cubegen can work with only fchk files but not of wfn/wfx files?
d. What is the cause of this error in Vsmax value.
Thanking You.
Hi there, I am currently studying the difference in electronic structure of carbenes. Suppose, there are three species, singlet and triplet CH2, and CH3 radical. How can I distinguish the location of the valence shell electron of these species?
Prof Lu,
I am trying to model the electron transfer from superoxide radical to benzoquinone molecule in the ground state. Can it be done with CDA approach? Or there are other better approaches?
One more small question. It does analyze the CDFT parameters using Hirshfeld charges. As these parameters are very much dependent upon atomic charge, DFT methods and basis sets, I just ask, Can I use mulliken and ChelPG or natural charge to calculate them? Can I use cam-b3lyp, m062x and wb97xd method and aug-cc-pvtz basis set?
Thank You Sir, I was testing this for CH4 molecule, and it worked fine with 6-311++G**, with 0 1 for N electron state. However, when it stops functioning with OH radical. Let me detail the procedure.
I load OH.fchk > 100 > 16 > 1
I input ub3lyp/6-311++G**
I input 0 2
Program hangs, it do not output the wfn files it did for previous time.
Thanks in Advance