<![CDATA[Multiwfn forum]]> - //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/index.php Wed, 02 Apr 2025 19:12:29 +0000 FluxBB <![CDATA[VASP Multiwfn support]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1641&action=new Thanks a lot!

]]>
Wed, 02 Apr 2025 19:12:29 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1641&action=new
<![CDATA[ELF basin populations and grid quality, use of solvent]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1640&action=new Dear professor, thank you for your time and help. The latest version program 17 1 9 4 12 works as intended indeed.

]]>
Mon, 31 Mar 2025 10:54:36 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1640&action=new
<![CDATA[ESP of a charged molecule]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=415&action=new The unit of ESP directly generated by Multiwfn is independent of charged state of the system. Only when you ask Multiwfn to export surface extrema or vertices as pdb file (in which B-factor field records ESP), the unit will be different for neutral and charged systems, because for charged systems, the ESP value on vdW surface is significantly larger than neutral systems, while the number of columns for recording B-factor in pdb format is very limited, so eV should be used instead of kcal/mol in this situation.

You can easily manually convert the unit. In addition, if you choose option "8 Export all surface vertices and surface extrema as vtx.pqr and extrema.pqr", then ESP will always be recorded in a.u. in the exported files, irrespective of charged state.

]]>
Sun, 30 Mar 2025 09:00:27 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=415&action=new
<![CDATA[GAMESS TDA-DFT Support]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1637&action=new Got it! Thanks for your reply!

]]>
Thu, 27 Mar 2025 14:57:49 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1637&action=new
<![CDATA[Obtain values of two electron integrals with gaussian09?]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1639&action=new IOp(3/33=3) extralinks=L316 scf=conventional noraff

]]>
Thu, 27 Mar 2025 03:59:00 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1639&action=new
<![CDATA[Issue with Obtaining Promolecule Energy in sobEDA]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1638&action=new You understanding is correct, an IOp is used to suppress orthogonalization. I didn't notice any freely available program that can suppress the orthogonalization...but I believe there should exist.

]]>
Wed, 26 Mar 2025 11:57:07 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1638&action=new
<![CDATA[EDA calculation is not going to complete]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1636&action=new Thank you sir !!!!

]]>
Wed, 26 Mar 2025 04:13:19 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1636&action=new
<![CDATA[Having trouble loading molecular list file in EDA]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1635&action=new Thank you very much Dr.Sobereva. That was useful. I was able to work out the EDA. Also I used CHELPG charges for more reliability. Thanks for that input too.

]]>
Sun, 23 Mar 2025 08:58:11 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1635&action=new
<![CDATA[Sigme- or Pi-hole characterization with Laplacian of Rho]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1634&action=new Dear Tian,
Too many thanks for your kind attention and the highly valuable, informative, and professional suggestion.

Sincerely yours,
Saeed

]]>
Sun, 23 Mar 2025 03:14:31 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1634&action=new
<![CDATA[Multiwfn crashes during electron excitation analysis]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1633&action=new Thank you for your help. I downloaded Multiwfn 3.7 instead of 3.8 by accident. Works like a charm now!

]]>
Sat, 22 Mar 2025 13:48:28 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1633&action=new
<![CDATA[Problem in EDA analysis]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1632&action=new Thank you sir

]]>
Fri, 21 Mar 2025 04:26:30 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1632&action=new
<![CDATA[An unexplainable observation in the EDA]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1631&action=new Dear Tian,
Many thanks for your highly valuable and informative comments.
Interestingly, as you have nicely recommended, the value of electrostatic interactions is quite consistent with the value of V_s,max calculated for heavy atoms in LAs.

Sincerely,
Saeed

]]>
Sat, 15 Mar 2025 05:42:38 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1631&action=new
<![CDATA[Gromacs itp file error]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1629&action=new atomtype opls_800 is involved in your topology file, while it was not defined in [ atomtypes ] field, so you need to add its definition to [ atomtypes ] field.

]]>
Thu, 13 Mar 2025 17:37:48 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1629&action=new
<![CDATA[Transition between excited states density]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1630&action=new Hello,

I am trying to calculate the transition dipole moment between the two excited states with GAUSSIAN software and to extract the transition density between excited states for later calculations (transition charges and other parameters) with Multiwfn. Would this be the right keyword setting for QM calculations in GAUSSIAN?

GAUSSIAN input sample for transition density between states 1 and 3:

 td=(singlets,nstates=5,root=1) cam-b3lyp/6-31g(d) density=transition=(3,1) 
 geom=connectivity iop(9/40=4) out=wfn 

Thanks in advance for the help!

]]>
Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:59:45 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1630&action=new
<![CDATA[Electron Density Surfaces For Individual Localised Orbitals]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1507&action=new Thank you very much.

Saeed

]]>
Tue, 11 Mar 2025 19:22:18 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1507&action=new