<![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / Help with NCI analysis with integration]]> - //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=941 Sat, 27 Jan 2024 15:47:47 +0000 FluxBB <![CDATA[Re: Help with NCI analysis with integration]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3601#p3601 I Will do this sir, thank you very much

]]>
Sat, 27 Jan 2024 15:47:47 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3601#p3601
<![CDATA[Re: Help with NCI analysis with integration]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3597#p3597 Both H-bond interaction and vdW interaction are evident for the two structures. If you only want to compare strength of H-bond, I would suggest using Multiwfn to perform AIM topology analysis to estimate H-bond interaction energy based on electron density at bond critical point of the H-bond using the relationship proposed in J. Comput. Chem. 2019, 40, 2868–2881, see Section 4.2.1 of Multiwfn manual for example.

If you want to study overall interaction strength, I would suggest directly calculating binding energy using quantum chemistry codes.

]]>
Thu, 25 Jan 2024 17:56:55 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3597#p3597
<![CDATA[Re: Help with NCI analysis with integration]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3596#p3596 Dear tian lu, i made a mistake while typing.
For the basal hydroxyl, i got a hydrogen bond interaction and a van der walls interaction as well.
NCI Isosurface:
Basal.png

Closest domain to the NCI Isosurface i got, which described very well the NCI isosurface.

dislin.png

While for the edge hydroxyl, i got this nci isosurface (VdW interaction and the hydrogen bond with the edge hydroxyl):

Borda.png

And this domain was the closest one i got:

dislin.png

dislin-1.png

But in the nci, the hydrogen bond and vdw interaction are not separeted, like above. So, since the interaction with the edge hydroxyl is the strongest, i understand the integral value will not be well comparable with the integral value for the basal hydroxyl i showed above, i believe.

]]>
Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:34:22 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3596#p3596
<![CDATA[Re: Help with NCI analysis with integration]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3595#p3595

one of the domains showed only the hydrogen bond interaction, and not the van der walls interaction

I don't know how did you obtain this conclusion, please clarify this point

Also, it is best to show me the NCI isosurface map so that I can better understand your situation.

]]>
Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:15:48 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3595#p3595
<![CDATA[Help with NCI analysis with integration]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3594#p3594 I performed a nci analysis for a system of graphene oxide with a ammonia molecule interacting with the edge and basal hydroxyl.
In the NCI analysis, i observed that the interaction with the edge hydroxyl is described by a hydrogen bond region and weak van der walls interactions with the carbons near the hydroxyl. The same goes for the basal hydroxyl.
When i perform the integration for this structure, i got a list of domains. In the edge, one of the domains showed only the hydrogen bond interaction, and not the van der walls interaction. On the basal hydroxyl, i got a domain with the van der walls interaction and the hydrogen bond.
How can i get the exact same isosurface i got in the NCI analysis, when i do the integration?
Just to add context: the bond strength with the edge hydroxyl is higher than with the basal hydroxyl. But, with these domains i am getting, the integral of the interaction with the basal hydroxyl is higher than with the edge hydroxyl, which i understand it should be the opposite.
I used the default criterion for defining the domain (<0.5).

]]>
Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:11:31 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3594#p3594