<![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / Second Order Perturbation Theory Analysis using Gaussian Software]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=838 The most recent posts in Second Order Perturbation Theory Analysis using Gaussian Software. Fri, 16 Jun 2023 05:48:14 +0000 FluxBB <![CDATA[Re: Second Order Perturbation Theory Analysis using Gaussian Software]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3206#p3206

Thanks a lot.

Regards,
Anjali

dummy@example.com (Anjali Ganai) Fri, 16 Jun 2023 05:48:14 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3206#p3206
<![CDATA[Re: Second Order Perturbation Theory Analysis using Gaussian Software]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3205#p3205

System2 has stronger overall hyperconjugation

dummy@example.com (sobereva) Fri, 16 Jun 2023 02:57:28 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3205#p3205
<![CDATA[Re: Second Order Perturbation Theory Analysis using Gaussian Software]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3204#p3204

Then how am I supposed to make comparison with other system since the other system also has a stabilization energy of 18.87 and 0.80 respectively for the same donor-acceptor pairs.
Added to this there are contributions involving s-orbital.
Here am giving an example of how the systems differ in their stabilization energy values.
System 1
donor-->p-orbital = 11.23
donor-->p-orbital = 9.06
donor-->s-orbital= 4.83

System2

donor-->p-orbital = 18.87
donor-->p-orbital = 0.80
donor-->s-orbital= 15.06

The donor orbital is the same in each case. It is a C-H sigma bond.

dummy@example.com (Anjali Ganai) Thu, 15 Jun 2023 10:42:22 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3204#p3204
<![CDATA[Re: Second Order Perturbation Theory Analysis using Gaussian Software]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3203#p3203

Dear Anjali,

Both of them should be considered. However, the two values cannot be added together, there will be an overcounting problem.

Best,

Tian

dummy@example.com (sobereva) Thu, 15 Jun 2023 10:06:28 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3203#p3203
<![CDATA[Second Order Perturbation Theory Analysis using Gaussian Software]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3200#p3200

Hello,

I have carried out the second order perturbation analysis and a small section of the output is (showing the involved NBOs and Stabilization Energies):

21. BD(1) C 25-H 28       /121. LP*(7)Fe 30    9.06
21. BD(1) C 25-H 28       /122. LP*(8)Fe 30    11.23

Now NBO No. 121 and 122 are almost pure P orbitals as can be seen from below
121. (0.09383) LP*(7)Fe 30     s(1.96%)p49.61(97.4%)d 0.30(0.60%)f 0.00(0.00%)
122. (0.08905) LP*(8)Fe 30     s(1.16%)p84.81(98.31%)d 0.46(0.53%)f 0.00(0.00%)

My question is which of the two NBO(121 or 122 or both) should I consider? Do I need to add both values of stabilization energies (11.23+9.06) to make comparison with other systems?

Regards,
Anjali

dummy@example.com (Anjali Ganai) Wed, 14 Jun 2023 15:32:04 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3200#p3200
Baidu
map