<![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / How to properly define fragments for PDOS graph?]]> - //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=816 Sat, 22 Apr 2023 16:23:00 +0000 FluxBB <![CDATA[Re: How to properly define fragments for PDOS graph?]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3116#p3116 Now it is very clear to me.
Thank you very much, sir!

]]>
Sat, 22 Apr 2023 16:23:00 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3116#p3116
<![CDATA[Re: How to properly define fragments for PDOS graph?]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3115#p3115 Fermi level is not well-defined for molecule systems, since their HOMO-LUMO gap is generally not small, making the position of Fermi-level has a strong arbitrariness.

For ease of comparison of DOS/PDOS maps of molecular systems, you can simply shift energy levels so that HOMO occurs at E=0 position. In the DOS module of Multiwfn (latest version), you can find an option "-6 Set shift of energy levels", after choosing it and inputting H, all MO levels will be shifted by -E(HOMO), and thus HOMO will exactly appear at E=0 in the DOS map.

]]>
Sat, 22 Apr 2023 11:45:03 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3115#p3115
<![CDATA[Re: How to properly define fragments for PDOS graph?]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3113#p3113 Sir, you answer helped me greatly. Thank you very much!
Just one more question, if you could answer me. When i make a DOS/PDOS graph to three similar systems, i get graphs with the fermi energy in different ranges of temperature. I see many articles that present this fermi energy in zero.
The correct procedure is to normalize all my graphs to present a fermi energy=0?

]]>
Fri, 21 Apr 2023 22:03:10 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3113#p3113
<![CDATA[Re: How to properly define fragments for PDOS graph?]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3112#p3112 The choice of the fragments has somewhat arbitrariness, I suggest:
1 COC
2 Only OH
3 COOH
Namely defining the whole functional group in common sense as fragment. In the paper, this definition should be clearly mentioned.

]]>
Fri, 21 Apr 2023 21:51:55 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3112#p3112
<![CDATA[How to properly define fragments for PDOS graph?]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3110#p3110 I am doing a PDOS graph for a graphene quantum dot (GQDs) molecule. This GQDs has hydroxyl, epoxy and carboxyl groups.
I don't understand how to define the fragments in my case:
1) For epoxy groups, should i include the carbons attached to the oxygens (C-O-C) or only the oxygens?
2) For the hydroxyl group, should i include the hydrogen of the O-H, and the carbon attached to this group, or only the oxygen?
3) For the carboxyl, should i include the whole COOH group, or only the oxygens?

This is important because it affects the PDOS graph a lot.

Thank you in advance.

]]>
Fri, 21 Apr 2023 18:10:23 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3110#p3110