<![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / comparison X-ray electron density and QTAIM analysis with MultiWFN]]> - //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=809 Fri, 14 Apr 2023 17:00:28 +0000 FluxBB <![CDATA[Re: comparison X-ray electron density and QTAIM analysis with MultiWFN]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3095#p3095 Dear Theo,

You can contact me via E-mail.

Multiwfn supports lots of volumetric data formats, such as .cub, .vti, .dx, .grd, etc. The experimental electronic density must be recorded by one of them, so that Multiwfn can load and deal with it.

Best,

Tian

]]>
Fri, 14 Apr 2023 17:00:28 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3095#p3095
<![CDATA[Re: comparison X-ray electron density and QTAIM analysis with MultiWFN]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3093#p3093 Dear Tian,
More details would be great. I will use it definitely. I am not sure how to feed the MultiWFN with X-ray data. We can get some high resolution just for this purpose at a low temperature.
Should I contact you by email?
Kind regards,
Theo

]]>
Fri, 14 Apr 2023 05:51:33 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3093#p3093
<![CDATA[Re: comparison X-ray electron density and QTAIM analysis with MultiWFN]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3092#p3092 Dear Theo,

To compare the difference, you can for example, using Multiwfn to calculate grid data of electron density, and take its difference with electron density determined by X-ray. The resulting electron density difference map is useful in visually comparing the difference.

It is noteworthy that Multiwfn supports calculating electron density for periodic systems based on molden file produced by CP2K periodic DFT calculation.

I can provide more details if you need.

Best,

Tian

]]>
Thu, 13 Apr 2023 15:10:18 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3092#p3092
<![CDATA[comparison X-ray electron density and QTAIM analysis with MultiWFN]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3088#p3088 Hi,
        [I am not sure if this topic was already posted, so I am posting now...]

Xray is an amazing tool but sometimes due to resolution/sensitivity it does not always provide 100% answer.
I can get XYZs from Xray, but those do not tell us much about oxidation state or hydrogens attached. Often hydrogens are invisible, and in some cases the atom assignment is not clear.  For that reason I am not interested in XYZ geometry at this time, I would like to compare electron density somehow.



I am mainly interested in single molecule X-ray electron density and QTAIM analysis (with MultiWFN preferentially).
I was wondering if there is an accepted workflow to connect or compare experimental X-ray density data with those coming from DFT?



(incomplete) Some readings related to Hirshfeld atom refinement (HAR) and generalized atom refinement (GAR) which is capable of  localization of hydrogen atoms, bonding electrons and anisotropic refinement of hydrogen atoms:
      1. S. C. Capelli, H.-B. Burgi, B. Dittrich, S. Grabowsky, D. Jayatilaka, IUCrJ 2014, 1, 361-379.)
      2. M. L. Chodkiewicz, M. Woińska, K. Woźniak, IUCrJ 2020, 7, 1199-1215.
      3. M. Fugel, D. Jayatilaka, E. Hupf, J. Overgaard, V. R. Hathwar, P. Macchi, M. J. Turner, J. A. K. Howard, O. V. Dolomanov, H. Puschmann,  B. B. Iversen, H.-B. Burgi, S. Grabowsky, IUCrJ 2018, 5, 32-44.
      4. Tonto software package on github (https://github.com/dylan-jayatilaka/tonto) HARt performs Hirshfeld atom refinements


Thank you.
Theo

EDIT: My interest is mainly in open shell molecules, like radicals or transition metals

]]>
Thu, 13 Apr 2023 12:35:54 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=3088#p3088