<![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / A question regarding AIM analysis]]> - //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=781 Mon, 27 Feb 2023 09:51:34 +0000 FluxBB <![CDATA[Re: A question regarding AIM analysis]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2984#p2984 Dear Tian,

Too many thanks for your highly valuable and informative comments, my nice friend.

Sincerely,
Saeed

]]>
Mon, 27 Feb 2023 09:51:34 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2984#p2984
<![CDATA[Re: A question regarding AIM analysis]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2983#p2983 Dear Saeed,

If a BCP can be found, then a bond path can always be generated, due to mathematical reason (this likes the fact that if TS can be located, in principle one can always generate IRC).
Presence of BCP (equivalent to presence of bond path) doesn't imply there must be a bonding interaction (or even prominent weak interaction).

Best,

Tian

]]>
Mon, 27 Feb 2023 06:06:16 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2983#p2983
<![CDATA[A question regarding AIM analysis]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2982#p2982 Dear Tian,
Within an AIM analysis if and only if a bond path is recognized between two interacting atom, then, one can conclude that these two atoms are bound while finding just a BCP does not guarantee their binding. In other words, a BCP may be found between two atoms A and B but they are not connected with a bond path; thus, they are not bonded (but due to presence a BCP between inter-nuclei distance, they somewhat interact together).

Please let me know I am right or wrong, my nice friend.

Sincerely yours,
Saeed

]]>
Sun, 26 Feb 2023 23:17:00 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=2982#p2982