<![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / Regarding HOMO-LUMO Coefficient.]]> - //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=490 Thu, 06 May 2021 02:26:05 +0000 FluxBB <![CDATA[Re: Regarding HOMO-LUMO Coefficient.]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1771#p1771 Thank you. I will try.

]]>
Thu, 06 May 2021 02:26:05 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1771#p1771
<![CDATA[Re: Regarding HOMO-LUMO Coefficient.]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1753#p1753 The description in the literature is very misleading. 6-31++G** is an extended basis set, it is in principle unable to say atomic coefficients in a MO.

If you need to discuss coefficients of atomic orbitals in the pi MOs, you should examine coefficients of natural atomic orbital (NAO), which has one-to-one correspondence to atomic orbital.

]]>
Wed, 05 May 2021 02:20:46 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1753#p1753
<![CDATA[Regarding HOMO-LUMO Coefficient.]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1747#p1747 I want to calculate the HOMO-LUMO coefficient for each atom of my molecules. I am using Gaussian software for calculations. As I can see in multiwfn manual, I can get the orbital percentage but not getting the HOMO-LUMO coefficient.  Herein, I have attached an image of a reported molecule depicting the HOMO and LUMO coefficient for each atom. Please help me regarding this.
HOMO-LUMO_Coefficient.jpg
Literature reference: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-020-02653-y.

]]>
Thu, 29 Apr 2021 09:32:54 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1747#p1747