<![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / << "Best" bond order analysis method >>]]> - //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=404 >.]]> Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:23:53 +0000 FluxBB <![CDATA[Re: << "Best" bond order analysis method >>]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1402#p1402 Thank you very much.

]]>
Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:23:53 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1402#p1402
<![CDATA[Re: << "Best" bond order analysis method >>]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1398#p1398 Different bond orders exhibit bonding character in different ways, it can hardly say which one is best or most accurate.
For the present situation, in which heavy metal is involved, you may first consider to use Mayer bond order, since it in principle works for any kind of bond. However, please note that Mayer bond order is incompatible with diffuse functions, so please avoid using diffuse functions.

]]>
Tue, 20 Oct 2020 22:30:10 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1398#p1398
<![CDATA[<< "Best" bond order analysis method >>]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1393#p1393 Hello,

In Multiwfn there are several methods/theories for calculating bond orders.

Right now, I am working with carbon and boron-nitride nanotubes interacting with heavy metals and amino-acids.

In your own experience, which one of those methods is the must, let said, accurate or the one that better represents the bond character?

Regards,

Camps

]]>
Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:35:39 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1393#p1393