<![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / Laplacian electron density of energertic materials]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=397 The most recent posts in Laplacian electron density of energertic materials. Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:26:47 +0000 FluxBB <![CDATA[Re: Laplacian electron density of energertic materials]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1379#p1379

Thank you very much for your suggestion. I will definitely try this now

dummy@example.com (shenaya) Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:26:47 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1379#p1379
<![CDATA[Re: Laplacian electron density of energertic materials]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1378#p1378

According to your statement, the properties at BCP of N-NO2 bond is indeed somewhat related to impact sensitivity, which, however, may be also controlled by other factors, and thus the observed impact sensitivity may not be fully explained by AIM theory.

These are solid materials, it is questionable to employ solvation model to represent surrounding environment as water. If you already have crystal structure (.cif file), you can extract a cluster (see https://youtu.be/fLXr6S-8-8g on how to do), fix coordinate of the boundary molecules and then only optimize the central zwitterionic salt. Due the crystal environment it is expected that H will not to dissocate. After that, you can check if the BCP properties are in line with your expectation.

dummy@example.com (sobereva) Thu, 24 Sep 2020 07:53:34 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1378#p1378
<![CDATA[Re: Laplacian electron density of energertic materials]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1377#p1377

In these molecules, N-NO2 is the trigger bond. So I've obtain the bond critical point between N-NO2 and obtained the properties at BCP.

In this article "Charge Density Distribution, Electrostatic Properties, and Impact Sensitivity of the High Energetic Molecule TNB: A Theoretical Charge Density Study.

The most sensitive bond is studied using laplacisan electron density.

Screenshot-2020-09-24-at-1-47-03-PM.png



Screenshot-2020-09-24-at-1-49-13-PM.png

As per attached discussion they have identified the weakest bond using laplacian electrons density, Gr, Vr and Hr.

dummy@example.com (shenaya) Thu, 24 Sep 2020 05:51:10 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1377#p1377
<![CDATA[Re: Laplacian electron density of energertic materials]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1376#p1376

Each BCP has corresponding electron density and its Laplacian, I don't know which BCP was studied.

According to my knowledge, there is seemingly no clear relationship between BCP properties and impact sensitivity. Have you ever seen any relevant literature discussing impact sensitivity in terms of BCP properties?

dummy@example.com (sobereva) Thu, 24 Sep 2020 03:39:50 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1376#p1376
<![CDATA[Laplacian electron density of energertic materials]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1375#p1375

Dear All,

I'm performing a study on the impact sensitivity of the energetic materials using AIM analysis. Here I'm using zwitterionic salts and to optimize the molecules I've used IEFPCM=water as the solvent. Gas phase optimizations are not successful as the H atom tend to dissociate and attache to O or N

CAM-B3LYP/6-31g(d)/IEFPCM=water

Screenshot-2020-09-24-at-11-14-00-AM.png

However I can not observe the desired trend from the laplace of electron density analysis.
           electrondensity         laplace               Sensitivity rank
NRTZ        0.394566243    -0.817435389       1
AMM            0.396351132    -0.80044764         3
Hy             0.386374712    -0.76654905         2
HyAm    0.38592834    -0.765011656       2

I expected highest negative value from least sensitive molecule and vise versa.
Hy and HyAm values are ok
NRTZvalue is overestimated.

Can you please comment on this.

Thanks,
Shen

dummy@example.com (shenaya) Thu, 24 Sep 2020 03:19:53 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1375#p1375
Baidu
map