<![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / NTO analysis error]]> - //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=371 Fri, 17 Jul 2020 09:35:04 +0000 FluxBB <![CDATA[Re: NTO analysis error]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1269#p1269 This is quite reasonable. Because after NTO transformation, the eigenvalue of the orbitals is no longer orbital energy but contribution of NTO to the selected electronic excitation. An occupied and a unoccupied NTO compose a NTO pair; in each NTO pair the two NTOs share the same eigenvalue.

If you are still confused, please check Section 3.21.6 of Multiwfn manual to gain basic knowledges about NTO method.

]]>
Fri, 17 Jul 2020 09:35:04 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1269#p1269
<![CDATA[NTO analysis error]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1268#p1268 I did TDDFT calculations using ORCA and loaded .gbw file to run NTO analysis. Did calculation and got value of HOMO-LUMO energy.

Untitled.png

But when I repeat the process again I am not getting energy gap. HOMO and LUMO have same energies

55(H ) --> Charge:  1.000000  x,y,z(Bohr): -11.214523  -3.650781   0.598930
   56(H ) --> Charge:  1.000000  x,y,z(Bohr):  -6.178762   1.802666  -4.288639
   57(H ) --> Charge:  1.000000  x,y,z(Bohr):  -0.057032  -5.519588   2.665837
Note: Orbital   105 is HOMO, energy:    0.978720 a.u.   26.632331 eV
       Orbital   106 is LUMO, energy:    0.978720 a.u.   26.632331 eV
       HOMO-LUMO gap:    0.000000 a.u.    0.000000 eV      0.000000 kJ/mol

What may be the reason?

]]>
Fri, 17 Jul 2020 05:08:59 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=1268#p1268